You seem a little confused.
#1 useless information - you were the one posting that MSP would be 3 cents by now
#2 I am not quoting anyone's post as "evidence". I am investigating the possible meaning implied by the Original Post (OP), and providing my own evidence to back up my research and conclusions.
#3 you can help me calculate? Doesn't seem so, because your maths is wrong.
You are ignoring that MSP cancels the shares that it is buying back. Leaving aside that the 90% is a meaningless number now, assuming that is still the target we are discussing then here are my calculations:
Be my guest and explain to me how I got it wrong - or apologize for your own errors.
#4 Delisting is not good for MSP. What is your basis for the argument? It is clear that the only buyer in the market for MSP is MSP itself. So what benefit do the double listing costs bring? There is no way to say that it is liquidity, and if shareholders are afraid of losing liquidity from delisting, they have been given almost a years' worth of notice that's what's happening, and a ready market for their stock.
#5 The company cannot takeover. Dude, the takeover already happened - MONTHS AGO - it has been announced to the market and there is a new CEO and Chairman, the company has already changed its name and corporate branding and it is a new stock ticker code - named after the subsidiary they acquired majority control of. Whether AVA owns 88.07%, 90%, or 95% does not reverse history and unwind the takeover. That's done. The question is simply delisting MSP now, and if AVA gets to vote on it.
