are they the uranium party???

With reference to the infamous photo and article that was recently in the paper, there are a few strange things that were not fully explained.

1. The picture was defintely one of the most uncomplimentary you could publish. Reminded me of Christopher Skase laughing while all the workers were owed millions of dollars.

2. All these bad criminal associations ?? have they been proven or is it just hearsay of the journalists?

3. The anti uranium party is in power? Are they the anti uranium party on what basis? Policies, some comment they said? election promise?

There is just so many bad points in the article that I am starting to think that maybe the journalist had a hidden agenda??

If anyone has some form of proof to back up the points made in the paper and prove my skepticism wrong, I would like to hear them.