Are we ready to admit covid vaccine dangers now?, page-92

  1. 304 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 141
    Epidemiologists are the world's dumbest people.

    Well second dumbest actually. Those who listen to them are dumber.

    Epidemiology is circular nonsense. Once most doctors believe something is true (eg a vaccine is safe or effective) the data usually manifests that way because doctors don't look for counter examples.

    In fairness, old school epidemiologists knew this which is why the double blind placebo controlled trial was born.

    Problem is, it's a complete failure. A monumental fraud.

    In drug/vaccine trials, subjects are effectively unblinded if they react to the drug/vaccine. As participants are typically prejudice in favour of the treatment they are likely to manipulate the results to make the treatment look good.

    So what to do?

    Well the pharma company answer is, typically, to make the "placebo" a poison. That's not a joke. By using a reaction causing control participants aren't unblinded.

    Of course, this means pharma companies are comparing their treatments to poisons and, if they're less or even no more dangerous, calling them safe and effective.

    It's deranged. It doesn't seem like it could be true.

    But it is.

    Incidentally, covid vaccines used actual placebos. Most other vaccines were tested against poisons.

    They're all a scam.

    And so is epidemiology.

    By the way, polio, rubella, measles, diphtheria, hepatitis b etc are all as common as they ever were. They just hide under different names because doctors typically refuse to diagnose or test for the disease if the patient is vaccinated.

    Rates of paralysis, congenital defects, deafness, respiratory disease, liver cancer have not fallen since those vaccines.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.