Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

FCT v WalkerGreig v FCTPuzey v COTFerguson v FCTFCT v WalkerAll...

First 7 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Headhunter

287 Posts.

91

18/07/20

17:46

Post #: 45957647
Share

Originally posted by Aussieasxgod: ↑

this is why I shouldn't get involved.

there is always someone who know it alls.

technically speaking a trader is a person who carries out business activities for the purpose of earning an income from buying and selling shares.

if you study tax law not at the under graduate level or at Swinburne tafe friend you would know

a 'business includes any professional but does not include occupation as an employee .

basically any federal case ruling which the dcot has won /which is deputy commissioner of taxation has won

comes down to these points

nature of the business
repetition , volume and regularity
organisation in a business like way
amount of capital

theoretically anyone with a full time work as an employee can't be regarded as a trader .

good to know google is your tafe teacher

Expand

FCT v Walker
Greig v FCT
Puzey v COT
Ferguson v FCT
FCT v Walker

All say you are wrong.....

Employment (full time or otherwise) is merely one of many factors to be considered and is far from determinative on its own.
2 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...

First 7 Last