Neddy,First off, thank you for supplying the full article.Been...

Neddy,

First off, thank you for supplying the full article.

Been away from the board this afternoon/evening, so a delay in replying.

In my post I neither said nor implied that Golden Webb was at Treasure Island - the paragraph in question deals with the fact that Focus Minerals had released information to a third party before shareholders, and Golden Webb is cited as the example contained in the article (the article is titled Focus Minerals and Treasure Island and covers matters other than Treasure Island).

The author of the article clearly stated that Golden Webb was part of the Greater Coolgardie Project and thus to repeat this information would be superfluous to the point I was making.

I fail to see how the paragraph in question does not accord with the doctrine espoused by either Fries, Jesperson or Kies in their various publications relating to the understanding and context of the english language, in that it (the paragraph) clearly defines its source (the article) and that a proper noun (Golden Webb) contained in it is well understood, or defined in the source (Golden Webb, located in Greater Coolgardie Area).

Think a bit more engaging of brain prior to mouth is warranted across a lot of posts appearing on this board.