A good read is the following EMA document...
"Reflection paper on the need for active control in
12 therapeutic areas where use of placebo is deemed ethical
13 and one or more established medicines are available"
http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2011/01/WC500100710.pdf
Extract...
"Where feasible, three-arm trials including experimental medicine, placebo and active control represent
24 a scientific gold-standard and there are multiple reasons to support their use in drug development.
25 However, there are situations where such trials are not required by CHMP for a properly informed
26 decision on benefit-risk.
27 It is the position of CHMP that, where ethical and feasible, a placebo control arm should be included in
28 the pivotal trial(s) used to support marketing authorisation application. The need for an active control
29 must be considered on a case-by-case basis. CHMP consider it to be particularly important for
30 estimated benefits and risks to be contextualised through comparison to active control where:
31 ?h the experimental medicine might be associated with safety concerns which impact mortality or
32 morbidity, markedly impair quality of life or cause active treatment to be discontinued or delayed
33 leading to significant, long-term or irreversible harm.
34 ?h treatment with a medicine of inferior efficacy might conceivably lead to significant, long-term or
35 irreversible harm for the patient.
36 In both scenarios, the comparison to active control will usually need to be ??direct?? (i.e. within the same
37 trial). There are few circumstances where an indirect comparison might be considered sufficiently
38 reliable.
39 This paper should not be interpreted as describing criteria used by CHMP for making a benefit-risk
40 decision. CHMP opinions are given on the basis of a benefit-risk balance in the context of a marketing
41 authorisation application. This paper outlines a framework for the discussion and justification of the
42 choice of control arms that is expected from an applicant in a marketing authorisation application."
Goes towards explaining why the "active placebo" argument is unlikely to carry any weight. It is clear that the "gold standard" for trials is to show stat signficance from placebo (baseline) to trial drug AND comparator (active control) to trial drug.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SNT
- article
article, page-3
Featured News
Add SNT (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
4.3¢ |
Change
0.004(10.3%) |
Mkt cap ! $59.04M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
4.0¢ | 4.3¢ | 4.0¢ | $127.5K | 3.135M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 107401 | 4.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
4.3¢ | 73324 | 3 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 107401 | 0.042 |
2 | 450008 | 0.041 |
6 | 1083186 | 0.040 |
5 | 1150900 | 0.039 |
3 | 1031600 | 0.038 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.043 | 73324 | 3 |
0.044 | 408500 | 3 |
0.045 | 51900 | 3 |
0.046 | 130236 | 2 |
0.047 | 184764 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 30/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
SNT (ASX) Chart |