As simple as this?, page-6

My preference is for a stock to build slowly and steadily, providing lots of opportunities for accumulation and light trading. It also is necessary to have higher daily volumes to make that possible, and SRT has provided that to date.

The incentives built into this deal perhaps would support that type of projected price movement over time as MT targets are met, and the players show their capacity to achieve company benchmarks, although obviously it is way too early to know here.

Of course this investment approach wont suit everybody - particularly if you are only looking for fast, quick profits, and looking to get set for company ticker code NBT (Next Big Thing ) such as M17 and well done to him and others who show us that it can be done.

But IMO following M17 (if you choose to do that) is not the same as shadowing his trades - far more important is identifying what he and other successful traders see that others don't, when interest is lacking but potential high in a stock, so you can really get set at a very low entry.

Then if the company starts to get on the move, you can exit for a nice return early (perhaps always at the acqua ann.), or stay on, build a really strong holding with a low effective average, and reap the really big rewards downstream. Low entries provide you with more choices.

So I think your comments are valid here - Intiger is a young operation, hungry for the right VC deal to provide it with performance benchmarks/benefits, networking and business support (that CV of MW's is amazing), plus access to the ASX - fertile ground for startups due to it's unique capital requirements.

From the outset, the terms appear to provide the right type of impetus, and may avoid the problems and false starts experienced by other RTO's recently. Time will tell.

The next weeks will no doubt put everyone's strategy to the test. GL whatever you choose to do.
BC