Exactly Disco but imo it shouldn't go on what the original...

Exactly Disco but imo it shouldn't go on what the original opinion was. The third umpire should be able to look at the evidence and make his informed decision on whether out or not. Not on whether there is enough evidence to overrule the original decision. The third umpire should be 100% certain the batsman hit the ball. what ever happened to the benefit of the doubt goes with the batsman