Yep, facts and evidence. For example, the SOR states that the...

Yep, facts and evidence.

For example, the SOR states that the payments were deposited into ISX group accounts by completely unnamed third party entity. In order for ISX to convince the court that it is deceptive and misleading, it must produce evidence to prove to the contrary, full stop. If ISX is unable to do that then the statement would automatically be the truth, especially if the ASX presents to the judge, "here is the account judge, see no name". It is that simple. Things are only convoluted if the evidence is circumstantial or vague. When the evidence consists of bank accounts, recordings, documents, etc...things become extremely simple. Why do you think ISX has amended its SOC 3 times? Very likely that we are going to encounter a fourth one.