"
Yes 6% had some ethics.Does not say much for the rest eh !"
Um, that $4.2Bn figure quoted by The Guardian article was the entire amount of jobkeeper received by the Listed entities required to report.
It is
not a figure that relates to amounts received by Listed entities who's revenues did not fall by 30% etc.
Quite a difference.
For example, QANTAS was the biggest recipient with $856m. It's revenues fell 58% YOY and posted a loss of $1.83Bn. QANTAS didn't repay any jobkeeper, but by your comments, they have no ethics?
It's not entirely your fault though. The Guardian has slanted their headline in such a way that the reader should expect the full 100% to have been repaid for some reason?
Cheers!
