Also, while I admit I don't know much about the law (certainly not in the area of libel/slander), I do find it hard to see how the statement "raising concerns about potential market manipulation" could qualify as defamation. If I were to say, "I'm not sure, but I suspect X has been manipulating the market, and I'd like you, the regulator, to look into it", I would be making a statement that accords with ASIC's rephrasing. But I would have thought that the qualifications prevent it from being libelous. I also don't see how Gallea's statement differs wildly from the AFR's statements, which have already been made (very much) in public. Like I said, I admit that in this area I'm 99% ignorant. But I'd be surprised if this qualified as defamation (albeit not so surprised that I might die).
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ASIC response
Also, while I admit I don't know much about the law (certainly...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 26 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WFL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.478M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
WFL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable