Basically he is saying that Borsky intends to introduce evidence that contradicts the witness.
Unless he still has some rabbit he intends to pull out of the hat he has done a really poor job at pinning him on anything. He's tried an hours worth of leading questions and got nowhere.
Even to the point the Judge has asked him if he still intends to keep to the timeline.
ASIC v ISX Hearing, page-1551
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2,288 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)