This was a 1289 ruling where Dumb didn't get the answer he wanted so he kept asking the question over and over hoping to get a response he needed to move forward. When he didn't he decided to spit the dummy and say that Prove it loser wasn't playing fair and although there was no possible way of proving it he insinuated the witness a lier. the Judge ruled that Dummy Spitter should just get on with it as he seemed to have no evidence and was spitballing.
All in all it was just a whole heap of spitting everywhere.
Good grief, can we just please get some hard evidence and not this is what we think, please ISX just fold and agree with us, as a full confession is the only thing we can hang you on!
SP1 Price at posting:
$1.07 Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
