That's the point though isn't it. He was trying to point out that they couldn't reasonably rely on 3.1A
Do you think he actually achieved that?I don't believe he did. He had several attempts, got lost, went round in circles and then gave up on it.
Even the judge got fed up with it.
I'm neutral on this, but yesterday Borsky did nothing to strengthen their case
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SP1
- ASIC v ISX Hearing
ASIC v ISX Hearing, page-1583
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1,967 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)