i thought the court case was about insiders getting advantages...

i thought the court case was about insiders getting advantages at the expense of other mumsndads shareholders, and the case was also about not putting some info into the public domain that a reasonable shareholders would expect to know.

anyway, on another note, howz about that near $3M loan given to the brother of the managing director - about the same time that $2M odd could not be found to win a $480M court case for mumsndads.....
or howz about not having to detail how much money the individual people in charge take out of the company each year.......