Well their current management aren't cooperating with the Senate Oversight Committee, so I don't see how spitballing would be beyond their repertoire.
In particular when there are close relationships embedded with the MO that may not be at arms distance.
But who knows for sure. Its just a bit of an odd coincidence that ASIC might think that a spitballing protocol is gold standard - like the benchmark. I recall their legal guys (MO and ASIC) both suggested to their Operational dudes (including the one that was shown the door gracefully), that that sort of evidential benchmark was haphazard at least and a legal hornets nest at worst.
Given the Senate focus, its anyone's guess. Its not all squeaky clean now is it.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SP1
- ASIC v ISX Hearing
ASIC v ISX Hearing, page-2400
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1,109 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SP1 (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO
Charles Armstrong
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online