that’s not what the order says, but at least you’re true to form
the security was to cover Visa’s reasonable costs.. the order simply confirms that the funds lodged as security are to be paid over to Visa..
that money isn’t going back to the defendants anymore, add it to the list of costs covered by shareholders
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SP1
- ASIC v ISX Hearing
ASIC v ISX Hearing, page-2407
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1,197 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)