Nice deflection. No ability to answer the point, so misquote and...

Nice deflection. No ability to answer the point, so misquote and move on.

I said that by your standards, JK "might be guilty but must be treated as innocent pending ASIC case".

Meanwhile, by your standards, you will treat all of ASIC, ASX, Visa, and most others, as completely innocent. You will also never ever suggest that any HC poster is a paid ASIC/ASX employee, and you will afford the assumption of truth to any who says they're a holder. After all, until it's proven they're not, how could you do otherwise?