ASIC v ISX Hearing, page-2723

Seriously, when one looks at the actions of the company and then later, what had been actioned (always divulged by sikel, as a past tense exhoneration) it's chalk and cheese and predominately not in the best interest of shareholders and actually toxic if at all there was a possibility a disagreement between parties.

But I ponder that ISX is nothing more than a vehicle to gain accessibility into the realms of where it really likes to sink it's septic fangs.