There is a clear and obvious distinction between being an advocate for a view you consider to be correct (as in this case) and being compromised as an expert by reason of an alleged lack of objectivity. Any fair minded person (I know I know) could see that this expert has hurt the ASIC case.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ASIC v ISX Hearing
There is a clear and obvious distinction between being an...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2,699 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)