ASN General Discussion, page-3500

I never claimed to be neutral or balanced. I just said I would share information both positive or negative (and i would ask questions in the some vein). In fact, the approval from BLM is actually full of information that would paint a slightly different (perhaps more negative) picture. I shared what was the most relevant. This is on federal land which i think sends a huge positive signal of the governments intention here.

The fact that you had to reply using words such as 'dribble' and 'comical' just proves my point. If you believe someone is wrong about something, why dont you try and dispel by using facts. That way everyone can learn something.