ASN General Discussion, page-75

You are right, clastic 31 is not included in Fig 1. So there is a small amount of inferred resource that can be added to the exisiting Long Canyon clastic 31 data simply from the addition of the new claims. In the whole scheme of things though, this will be a very small amount. The re-entries are needed for any meaningful increase in JORC resource.

Thankfully, based on exisiting data across the project area, clastics 17, 19, 29 and 33 at Long Canyon 2 plus Mississippian at Cane Creek and Long Canyon 2, have very strong potential to increase the resource massively. Without checking specific numbers, I recall the Long Canyon Mississippian target alone had potential for indicated 500kt LCE at 100ppm.

The planned work at Long Canyon and Cane Creek, both of which only need addendum approvals to exisiting permits, have excellent potential to increase the LCE indicated resource from current 192kt to over 1million tonnes. Then add Mineral Canyon and Sunburst and that number at least doubles again. And that is not to mention the bromine resource which already has 1.176million tonnes indicated and will be 5mill + following this resource upgrade program.