Assaying results?, page-42

Rm8,

Its not easy being a ceo of a public company.

The initial dates dusko provided would have been based on what the jv partners anticipated.

Thus he passed that one, I'd assume the partners changed time frame, and again dusko passed it on.

Its the same with campaign one, when you start on a project never drilled, you would naturally start with targets you identified on the surface.

Either hits the mark or not that way.

The only thing I would have done different is I would have drilled 300 aircor spaced 500m and to bedrock in lines and seperate by 500m per line.

Aircor gridding.

And sampled the last metres of the bedrock.

Is generally what I do as erosion settles on bedrock, esp if the overburden deposited after the lithium formed.

We do have exposed basalt, without overburden. .

It appears what is on the surface is not reliable and erosion not tested.

Erosion there would have occurred pre overburden, so anything on bedrock would have shed from minerals not outcropping at all.

Still in hindsight it is easy to call and judge a prior event, that one could not prior to it.