Asx defence, page-12

You need to work on your basic reading comprehension realise the context in question.


The above is in response to ISX's claim...



...that the publication of the final reasons caused the damage.

Now all of those articles AS WELL AS OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES, that you so expediently omitted, represents...


...examples of negative and adverse media and other scrutiny involving ISX. The ASX is also stating that the ASX would present more in court, presumably confidential ones, not for public consumptions.

So the idea is that ISX must proof that it was the publication of reasons that caused the damage and none of the those things outlined.