ASX List Rule Info, page-3

@lgs

Cheers again.

Like u, do hope the services r retained and also appreciate the comments re concerns of buying based on discovered banner headline...but as I say below - we speculate everyday on stocks this end of town on snippets found in the WWW....wash my mouth out...

Was already typing my last thoughts to @F6T post so will post under this heading...the vid is essentially the same one on the WBT website but one @Juststarted found had the banner headline on it (only real diff from what I can c).......but call me cynical or skeptical

@F6T

Flash......

Whilst wot appears as a fair valid plausible explanation by Co. given to @lgs, logic still dictates to me the question of why this person would inadvertently put up the headline banner regarding "Mr Cook" of Apple - why not someone else, some unknown or made up or why put a name in at all....if just a mock up?

Why use Mr Cook....wishful thinking maybe?

Why the urgency to take it down / change?

Speculation by punters like us.....we do that everyday with these stocks....

Because @Juststarted found and posted it - if not, would the banner have been changed?

Just don't get it but.....only they know the truth....that's the plain fact.

However, not entirely convinced myself that this was an error - time will tell obviously...so....just back to waiting till turn something else up.

The iPhone assessment article I posted did just raise further questions and the flash was a burning one IMO. Is not normal standard moby fare on front facing flash from what I have found - so what do they want it for - again, time will tell.

Wishful thinking below.....

Logically in a a commercial sense - Apple is known for innovation (Supposedly? I'm an Android fan myself as another poster said as well), we know Apples main competitors r ramping up and moving forward with Iris tech (Samsung, ZTE, Docomo / Fujitsu etc), we know Samsung r in mobile payments with Loop Pay and also Paypal now (from memory), we know Apple has Apple Pay, we know Apple does not have eye biometrics (as yet anyway).

Would it not make sense for them to look to possibly meet the same tech as their competitors but with a couple of glaring advantages to exploit & market as a point of differentiation and a more innovative secure, more advanced biometric product?....one time pin, corneal / iris multi biometric coupled even, with their apparently leading fingerprint tech to boot?

Maybe I c things differently, maybe I'm way off base in assuming or applying my warped logic......but, just not convinced till I see black & white.......

Will leave it be now....nice arvo all.