Could argue either way I think brantley using the "reasonable person" rule re disclosure. It could well be argued that altho fax was sent on 24th it was not actually received by JR and MG (altho' they were aware late 24th but out of the country shortly thereafter). Then if Sentry's President calls them the next day (on the 25th) to further discuss the terms it could be argued that a reasonable person would feel disclosure of sentry's fax was premature.
Apologies for blathering on. I'll shut up now. Have to admit tho' that mhl might be all the things posted - but never boring !
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MHL
- asx notice: response to asx query
asx notice: response to asx query, page-16
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MHL (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
CCO
THE CALMER CO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Anthony Noble, MD & CEO
Anthony Noble
MD & CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online