Of all the ones at 2.02, TLW would have about half.
Seeing TLW cannot shares above 2.02, all the rest are for someone else; and the shares have been changed from large number of shares holders holding small number of shares to very small number of holders holding large number of shares; and from what I can assess, by a factor of 10. All these would not be, in my view, due to churning or day trading as you cannot make much profit in the price range concerned. They are all either: 1. In anticipation of a higher price bid or 2. A bidder accumulating (or someone doing it on behalf of another bidder) or 3. Could be someone wanting TLW shares and see it as a cheap way in.
I hope it is No. 2, and Kingfisher has just provided another catalyst for this.
Regarding the Acamas debate, why are we still going on and on about Potter and his crew? There is nothing anyone can do about it unless you are a substantial holder. It is basically a done deal, and there is nothing! nothing! you can do about it. LOOK FORWARD!
Potter may have initiated t/o talks, but in the end, his vote is ONE on the round table. How many are there on the board? The decision would have to be a majority vote. Democracy remember?
Also remember this, the board and Potter works with info NOT available to the rest of us. Whilst I would love to have HDR gone on to 3, 4, 5.00, it's not going to happen. Even if we can prove that SP did make a blue on this decision. I am glad to get out of jail at just over 2.00. Get over it people!
HDR Price at posting:
0.0¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Not Held