If you can you put as much Capex as you can on the shareholders because its interest-free and it greatly improves NPV. You just have to pay a dividend at some time.
It makes the project much easier to sell on, and it also makes the company more vulnerable to hostile takeovers because debt always acts as a poison pill by increasing project risk.
Its almost like (if they go 100% equity) they're setting up for a sale if a good offer comes along.
But it also means they can borrow more money for later expansion - so with an LiOH plant at a $1 billion they'll have debt of $1b & not $1.5b, which in turn makes the expansion NPV even better
It's short term pain for us, because there won't be a retail offer, just instos & their sophs and they'll sell for a quickie.
Personally I'd be surprised if its 100% equity but if they can get it away, why not. It means NO DEBT, a better NPV, and the project remains tier 1 and totally unicumbered.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- LTR
- ASX Today
ASX Today, page-13661
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 30,338 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add LTR (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
59.5¢ |
Change
-0.030(4.80%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.442B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
62.0¢ | 62.5¢ | 59.0¢ | $8.852M | 14.66M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
17 | 212314 | 59.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
60.0¢ | 310624 | 8 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
11 | 151216 | 0.595 |
11 | 151410 | 0.590 |
9 | 89027 | 0.585 |
25 | 187601 | 0.580 |
5 | 84391 | 0.575 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.600 | 99920 | 4 |
0.605 | 95000 | 1 |
0.610 | 30293 | 3 |
0.615 | 141300 | 6 |
0.620 | 42300 | 3 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 06/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
LTR (ASX) Chart |