Differences between PLS & LTR.
1. PLS management experienced at constructing and operating profitably SC6 projects. LTR not.
2. PLS JORC Resources = 414 mtns. LTR JORC Resources = 156 mtns. Hence PLS LOM > LTR LOM
3. PLS Cash = about A$3b. Negligible debt. LTR Cash = about A$300m (Before project completion) Debt soon to be A$760m.
4. PLS has negligible interest expense. LTR will have considerable interest expense.
5. PLS production forecast FY26 = 1000mtns. LTR production forecast FY26 = 613mtns.
6. PLS open pit mine. LTR UG mine. Sustaining capital higher for UG mine.
7. PLS involved in a LiOH Factory JV with POSCO. Already developing experience in vertical integration. LTR not at same stage.
Hence the PLS value > than LTR. Unlikely they will have the same valuation metrics at least in short term.
Hence why I think PLS should merge with LTR. PLS's strengths will make LTR a considerably more efficient & profitable company. This will ultimately benefit the shareholders of both companies.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- LTR
- ASX Today
ASX Today, page-36153
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4,993 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add LTR (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
93.0¢ |
Change
0.030(3.33%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.254B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
87.0¢ | 94.0¢ | 83.5¢ | $48.47M | 54.88M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
9 | 1009895 | 93.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
93.5¢ | 149856 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
7 | 931089 | 0.930 |
6 | 343657 | 0.925 |
2 | 157034 | 0.920 |
4 | 197034 | 0.915 |
6 | 72988 | 0.910 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.940 | 235538 | 11 |
0.945 | 167034 | 2 |
0.950 | 208034 | 5 |
0.955 | 31000 | 3 |
0.960 | 51571 | 5 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 26/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
LTR (ASX) Chart |