Why would Gina be lowering SP simply to encourage another party to bid to take over LTR, unless you are suggesting that she needs to JV with the bidder? The manipulated low SP isn't going to sway holders, TG or the Board to sell cheaply at this late stage by accepting another $3 bid, let alone something under that. Gina needs LTR if she is to become a major supplier to India as she's obviously attempting.
Why would Gina be lowering SP simply to encourage another party...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 954 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add LTR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
96.5¢ |
Change
0.050(5.46%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.340B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 92.0¢ | 98.0¢ | 92.0¢ | $15.00M | 15.73M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 148095 | 96.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 96.5¢ | 275693 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 26/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| LTR (ASX) Chart |