Yeah . It's pretty obvious you didn't us to get the whole story . Just your biased view of it . Particularly using documents from IPA .
But anyway , back to the facts :
This document that you are quoting is based on data that is at least 6 years old . Maybe 8 .
So the numbers you have posted are now totally inaccurate and therefore irrelevant . Further to that , the numbers suggesting for new coal has no reference document . Cleverly weaved in to make us think it is genuine .
So , as usual , the coal lobby has the hard right getting very creative with the truth . Old data , suggestive text that plays to the right wing beliefs of some without question .
In the meantime , here's some more up to date data .
Charts from Reneweconomy and http://rameznaam.com/2014/10/05/solar-wind-plunging-below-fossil-fuel-prices/
