Yeah . It's pretty obvious you didn't us to get the whole story . Just your biased view of it . Particularly using documents from IPA .
But anyway , back to the facts :
This document that you are quoting is based on data that is at least 6 years old . Maybe 8 .
So the numbers you have posted are now totally inaccurate and therefore irrelevant . Further to that , the numbers suggesting for new coal has no reference document . Cleverly weaved in to make us think it is genuine .
So , as usual , the coal lobby has the hard right getting very creative with the truth . Old data , suggestive text that plays to the right wing beliefs of some without question .
In the meantime , here's some more up to date data .
Charts from Reneweconomy and http://rameznaam.com/2014/10/05/solar-wind-plunging-below-fossil-fuel-prices/
- Forums
- Political Debate
- At last the True Costs
Yeah . It's pretty obvious you didn't us to get the whole story...
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
SS1
SUN SILVER LIMITED
Gerard O’Donovan, Executive Director
Gerard O’Donovan
Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online