Refer to point 54 onwards for the rationale behind the amount. Again, removing political and personal bias' there is legal precedent.
https://www.humanrights.gov.au/sites/default/files/document/publication/Basikbasik v Commonwealth 2014 AusHRC 77_WEB.pdf
- Forums
- Political Debate
- At least Triggs is consistent:
Refer to point 54 onwards for the rationale behind the amount....
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 26 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)