Would it be correct to think that it might not be a bed thing...

Would it be correct to think that it might not be a bed thing for ANZ to be a substantial stakeholder hold of MSF/OCV? Would that mean ANZ might see values in those shares which it has seized? Or ANZ might want to join the party (might be unwillingly) at the end in order to restore some value for those shares they have just claimed ownership. Otherwise, I would be thinking it is irrelevant if OCV does go under at the end like many of us have been suggesting in this forum.