H:'How do you know this ? Did you survey them yourself? '
I gave you an example of how I know this. I looked up and read the Australian Institute of Physics policy document. Did you ?
H:This is a popular lie.
The contrary is true.
I'll bet you can not nominate any survey of a statistically significant number of qualified scientists (not activists) which supports your claim.
The example I gave was a National Scientific Body policy statement. They represent the entire body of professional physicians in Australia. The American Institute of Physics has a similar statement. Could this be any clearer ?
You cannot dismiss maths/stats, computer professors and those from dozens of other disciplines as irrelevant because your beloved "climate science" incorporates something of them all.
You are beginning to not make any sense.
You have been constantly howling for weeks that physicists definitively did not support AGW. I have proved you wrong.
Now you have moved onto mathematicians/computer professors.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- atlantic multi decadal oscillation
H:'How do you know this ? Did you survey them yourself? 'I gave...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 42 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO & MD
Charles Armstrong
CEO & MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online