Aren't the manganese assets held by Shaw mostly the manganese...

  1. 24,182 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 30
    Aren't the manganese assets held by Shaw mostly the manganese rights to land that AGO owns .?
    Isn't Shaw mostly owned by AGO already?
    Why would they buy back something they once owned ?

    Talk of overseas acquisitions is good. But for it to make sense it has to provide more profit for less capital than an investment in Ridley.
    Or are they banking on using sales proceeds from Ridley to go to buy something O/S.?
    Where does that place Balla Balla.

    Looks to me they are softening people up for the next raising.

 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.