Attorney General Barr Says It's Clear - Social Media Platforms Are 'Engaged in Censorship', page-6

Social media platforms have been forced to cut back on 'free speech' content for the past couple of years with good reason.

Outcries on live broadcasts of the Christchurch killings; hate rants on minorities; bullying of children to the point of suicide and passing on of obviously false medical information that has killed have lead to a greater understanding of the need to at least limit the extremes.

Of course the narrative pushed by Barr etc is only to allow his mob to publish any BS they can think of - pretty sure even they would object to child porn advertisements ; live murder contracts ; rape broadcasts and millions of other equally horrific scenarios being allowed to be on social media outlets.

So the real question is what level of censorship is the minimum required by a modern society. Does the intent of the poster to deceive have a role in whether the content is censored?