Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Thanks Christianno surprise there

First 79 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
conhater

76 Posts.

03/03/21

16:07

Post #: 51489641
Share

Originally posted by PurpleXS2: ↑

in a civilized society, there's a difference between an accusation, and proof - whether it be proof beyond reasonable doubt, or even 'probable' truth.

And when we're dealing with an event alleged 30 plus years ago, the prospects of discening truth is very limited, and likely Buckley's chance.

The only corroboration, if the allegation is well-founded, could be in the form of witness testimony from or shortly after such alleged event - look up "recent complaint".

Alternatively 'similar fact' evidence of the alleged perp doing similar things. Again in this case, most likely Buckley's.

Without corroboration, I would dismiss the allegation.

P

Expand

Thanks Christian

no surprise there
1 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 245 more messages in this thread...

First 79 Last