I personally see long range strike capability being either the ability to project power further than we currently can, such as with the purchase of the new oilers and canberras, or a cruise missile capability for the new frigates, AWD, and subs or a replacement for the F-111s. under no circumstance do I see Aus going down even conventionally armed ballistic missile route let alone nuclear armaments.
good to see another poster with knowledge of what they are saying and taking a logical view rather than an uneducated political baashing view.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- AUKUS
I personally see long range strike capability being either the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 35 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)