Aura seeks compensation for Swedish uranium ban 2018, page-134

Agreed Obviously the Swedish government was more than comfortable letting the idea of the spent uranium facility be pitched to them.

It appears they listened intently to the idea of the value it would create and the overall necessity of the project, given nuclear power will need to increase to meet emissions targets.

Now, if they listened with open ears to whoever pitched this idea. They surely will be open minded when it comes to Aura's executives and Diplomat services presenting our case.

The other thing to note the spent uranium facility is a new concept for them. It is the first on to be built in Sweden. The difference we have is that Uranium mining previously was legal.

So instead of having to convince the politicians and public that an entirely new concept is viable (spent uranium facility), we simply have to convince them to reverse a decision that may have been made prematurely purely for political reasons. The climate has changed (excuse the pun).

Goodluck