"According to Demographia any retirement/downsizer destination is ''overpriced, expensive and inflated?"
he he he...booz...you are doing averything in your power to NOT understand Demographia properly, aren't you?
you know that it is a world report that was done in the office and not in actual Bundaberg or any of the other places on the list which encompasses USA, Canada,Oz and UK(if i'm not mistaken)...
they are counting on local knowledge that 'us locals' would have in those markets, so even if canadians didn't know 'what' bundaberg is, we, Aussies, would know and understand the shortcomings of their methodology ! and 'took' it into account while judging their 'works'.
that doesn't mean that Sydney numbers were wrong, or Melbourne numbers...or any other 'regular' place with 'regular' earnings and regular crowds of working folk!
so by you 'honing in' on one or two places which, by their own nature are different and hence skew the numbers, you are actualy picking on an anomaly rather then on major part of the 'works' !
