You have to wonder though, whether the improvement in photography quality coincided with a worsening of player behaviour(increase in cheating) and subsequent decrease in ball movement Some of the ball movement achieved in the eighties/early nineties was truly frightening- one bowler in particular had an inswinging yorker which looked fake it swung so much. I wont mention who but if you follow cricket you know who im talking about.
AS far as i can see such feats have been condemned to history. Everything else in cricket has become bigger faster stronger , but ball movement has declined( except for starcy and his inswingers - which got found out in the end) . Yes the duke allows a little more but not to the extent that used to occur.
