Science is pretty much the opposite of faith
You're labelling of people who accept the current science as requiring some kind of blind religious mindset is warped.
What do you want me to explain about that data exactly ? I am not a client scientist and either are you
"As soon as some one uses "Scientific Consensus" instead of knowledge and factual data about the variation in climate, you know they are from the...."
What do you think a consensus is based on ? Research and data possibly ?
Logic escapes you and every other "sceptic"
If the consensus was that climate change was not caused by humans but just a natural cycle over time, would you accept the science then ? Are you a sceptic for sceptics sake or just blinded by ideology ?
