Its levelised costings that should be assessed. This takes into...

Its levelised costings that should be assessed. This takes into account all of what you requested. Nuclear doesnt come close to that of renewables with storage, in any country anywhere in the world. The ever and expedient growth in renewable and storage technology and efficiencies creates even further divergence in levelised costs going forward. Its not even debatable. Its like trying to argue climate change or that earth is round, sorry.

If only people were interested in listening and assessing analytically the expertise, and were aware of their prejudices in the process. Its absurd to doubt the CSIROs interests/standards. Its a world leading and respected institute who gave the world solar pvs. It was idealogues that refused to listen and/or see there potential at thr time so sold the tech to China instead.

Sure there are shortfalls in renewables at the moment, but when has there ever been an adoption of new technology at such a scale and expediency in history that hasnt faced hurdles? It takes time to iron these out, especially when dealing with existing bygone infrustructure. There is also a number of case studies around the world that have adopted 100% renewable energy succesfully.