I'm not sure about that.
Just because an entity 'borrows' the share does not mean they have to sell them.
I understood they can sit on them or just sell a portion.They simply have to pay the fee to the entity from which they borrow the shares.
The reason they appear as a short position is because the 'lending' entity have to register that 'short' transaction
If I'm wrong please let me know the reason why.
Australian article re Hancock, page-154
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 69 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add STX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
17.5¢ |
Change
-0.005(2.78%) |
Mkt cap ! $501.4M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 18.0¢ | 18.0¢ | 17.0¢ | $1.170M | 6.732M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 37 | 1634397 | 17.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 17.5¢ | 617607 | 7 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 16/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| STX (ASX) Chart |