Look at the map posted a couple of pages earlier which shows a bit of the subsurface detail. This thing above is just a bit of PowerPoint graphics which actually says nothing useful in the unitisation context. If you look at the subsurface maps they show a strong probability of a connection between SE1 and the WE above the GWC.
I have not said unitisation is a fact. All I have said is that on the face of it there must be a strong case for unitisation and I doubt Warrego/Hancock will not actually be discussing that with Strike or intending to discuss it. Get your facts straight please.
Australian article re Hancock, page-196
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 27 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add STX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
22.5¢ |
Change
0.010(4.65%) |
Mkt cap ! $643.6M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 22.5¢ | 23.0¢ | 21.5¢ | $3.339M | 14.95M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 337869 | 22.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 23.0¢ | 1651352 | 24 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 21/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| STX (ASX) Chart |