Australians' concern over global warming rebounds, page-53

  1. 945 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 4
    How sad that we have on this forum zealots that that have no concept on the difference between climate change and weather.

    There is a Climate forum for this specific topic so could you Al gore sheep move the conversation to there

    it appears there is no interest in science when it comes to climate change just the regurgitation of ignorant slogans , quoting cherry picked and falsified data to promote the political and behind the scenes monetary agenda
    The Truth be known climate change was happening prior to humans and will continue beyond humans

    Selectively ignoring earths climate history over millions of years or even one hundred thousand years demonstrates the cherry picked data carries a large margin of error .

    Just looking over the last 10000 years the hottest year on modern record rank 9099 .

    The famous hockey stick graph and data exaggeration ( falsification ) admitted by the IPCC
    The core of the IPPCC faith based on 13 of a possible 5000 samples to establish climate change theory
    When questioned to reveal the research the head IPPCC scientist refuses for fear of the fraud being committed exposed.
    When the additional data is taken into account the exaggeration of temperature rises is revealed and found to be ten fold a whole court case in us to pry this information out.

    The so called consensus on climate change turns out tho be a few hundred government scientists as admitted by IPCC as opposed to thirty one thousand scientist including 9000 PHD

    Only the ignorant or the those who turn a blind eye would ignore this.

    The science is far from being settled
    The removal of certain variables that did not enhance the rise in temperatures a classic example of the differences between IPCC soothsaying and observation
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.