Nothing new here. People rejecting power lines running via there land holding's, same with solar farms, solar farms have already proven that sheep grazing is great in and around solar farms.
I'm pretty sure people will also reject a nuclear reactor in there back yard. Now power lines yes some already installed from the coal fired plants but if you increase the out put you will also have an urgent need to upgrade those delivery systems.
So the whole upshot of this so called news piece is much ado about sweet FA.
I can't see the farmers getting much sympathy in the long run if people in the city can't run there AC.
Farmers are currently getting 40K per year per turbine on there land. once that becomes general knowledge do you think city folk will be on the farmers side??
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Australia's Nuclear Future
Australia's Nuclear Future, page-300
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 358 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online