Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Australia's Nuclear Future, page-301

First 301 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
pintohoo

85,795 Posts.

75

29/06/24

16:38

Post #: 74532400
Share

Originally posted by andyno3 ↑

Nothing new here. People rejecting power lines running via there land holding's, same with solar farms, solar farms have already proven that sheep grazing is great in and around solar farms.
I'm pretty sure people will also reject a nuclear reactor in there back yard. Now power lines yes some already installed from the coal fired plants but if you increase the out put you will also have an urgent need to upgrade those delivery systems.
So the whole upshot of this so called news piece is much ado about sweet FA.

I can't see the farmers getting much sympathy in the long run if people in the city can't run there AC.
Farmers are currently getting 40K per year per turbine on there land. once that becomes general knowledge do you think city folk will be on the farmers side??

Expand

''Now power lines yes some already installed from the coal fired plants but if you increase the out put you will also have an urgent need to upgrade those delivery systems.''

and just normal aging replacement - apparently a hell of a lot of transmission lines in Oz are old and need replacement anyway
2 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

NRX

Noronex kicks off EM survey at Humpback, Namibia – part of South32's earn-in deal to access Kalahari Copper Belt

The Rising Tide: How institutional adoption is shaping the future of crypto

How flooding did Strategic Energy Resources a favour: Four holes down in 'redesigned' gold & copper campaign

CC9

Chariot locks in high-potential drill target at Black Mountain, one of the USA's largest lithium landholdings

Reporting wrap: Inghams, Accent, Mayne Pharma

There are more pages in this discussion • 357 more messages in this thread...

First 301 Last

SPONSORED BY