You are being lied to about Solar power. From X userJohnLeePettimore: The consumption of material resources using the photovoltaictechnology is at least 64 times that of nuclear energy. For the production ofthe solar-grade silicon for one square meter of panel area it requires 3.5 kgof concentrated hydrochloric acid.

͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏

	Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more Monday's Energy Absurdity: They're Lying To You About Solar David Blackmon Jul 1 READ IN APP Upgrade to paid You are being lied to about Solar power. From X user JohnLeePettimore: Share The consumption of material resources using the photovoltaic technology is at least 64 times that of nuclear energy. For the production of the solar-grade silicon for one square meter of panel area it requires 3.5 kg of concentrated hydrochloric acid. The weight of concrete, steel and chemicals used, such as acids/ bases, etchants, elemental gases, dopants, photolithographic chemicals etc. are never included. PV technology is more than 7 times more labor intensive than other energy sources. They never include disposing of the worn out panels, recycling copper wiring etc. after solar farms have reached end of life. So when they tell you solar makes back the energy used to build and maintain them in X amount of time, they are actually lying to you. [End] You're currently a free subscriber to Energy Transition Absurdities. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription. Upgrade to paid Like Comment Restack © 2024 David Blackmon 10324 Reata Estates Drive, Mansfield, TX 76063 Unsubscribe